A college professor said that asking immigrants where they came from is othering. This professor is letting me know one of the many rules people at expensive schools invented for society to follow. White people are no longer allowed to other those other people. The foreigner didn’t mind that I othered him. He was happy someone talked to him. Do socialist professors care about those other people? They seem more interested in you and me being wrong. So, what do these socialists think they are right about?
According to both Fascism and Marxism, a collective mind builds reality. They got this idea from a confused philosopher named Hegel. Whenever Hegel’s version of reality takes control, millions of people die, so you would think that intelligent people would stop thinking like Hegel. Instead, the way Hegel redefined reality gets imitated in the humanities departments at most major universities. Hegel’s apostles do not see themselves as ordinary members of the Borg Collective; they see themselves as the Queen. The old Fascist and Marxist leaders saw themselves as heroes in Hegel’s epic. It does not start with a charismatic leader. It begins with a few disgruntled intellectuals.
No one reads Hegel; they read misinterpretations of Hegel. To explain what Hegel said, we would need a long book about the ancient god Zeus and how civilization destroys and uses. Instead, let me tell you about a professor who looked and acted like the villain in a movie called The Fifth Element. That movie villain was called Zorg. The doctor kept a ceramic statue of themselves with the Zorg haircut on their desk. Though the professor had practiced genital mutilation, the intent was not to be transexual. The genius proudly claimed to be a mind free from the distractions of the body. The body modification chemicals caused complications, and my teacher died young.
People have the right to follow their bliss, but which paths lead to health and which are more like addictive drugs? A lot of people start as unpopular kids, and like most kids, the young prodigy needed acceptance, but instead of living through challenges the way normal people do, the Marxist view of history provides a feeling of being part of a larger community. The latest edition of the grand narrative embraces queer behavior. Basically, they consider alternative behavior to be brave. Teenage Zorg’s hostile appearance was accepted as heroic. Was there really a community that accepted the young hero, or was it imaginary? When a person like Zorg walks down the street, most people do not see the Hero. They see someone who hates them.
The subject of the professor’s class was respect, though nothing in Zorg’s class was about earning respect through merit. The class would study black feminist writers. I was told that these lesbians stand up for themselves in their writing. That’s not true. Most of them repeat jargon from European men. So, in other words, they complain about society, which they think is their job because they consider themselves morally superior prophets of a brave new world where everyone will obey the rules of their narrative. I have no idea how many billions of dollars are wasted teaching poststructuralist semiology. I’m pretty sure that if we spent it on real research, we would have flying cars, realistic sexbots, and no world hunger. Instead, these grievance studies tell us that math is racist and that glaciers do not have gender.
After hearing that I was from another country, the doctor invited me to support people who crossed the border without permission from the government. I politely said no since thousands of people die during illegal migration, and I told them that a properly managed border would save lives. Then, the professor confidently said, “You are not my first fascist.” Like most antifascists, the academic has never met a real fascist and never will. The other students wanted me to apologize for my thoughtcrime. Now, they think that I am full of evil. Teachers like Zorg taught them unnecessary fear.
Leftists can’t conceive of anyone not thinking about them. In today’s Marxist dialectic, there are only two possible ways of thinking: revolutionaries generate truth, while the less intelligent fear change. Deplorables like you conspire an insurrection against the enlightenment of social reform. Any opinion against the greater wisdom of the revolution is harmful to the characters in their fantasy. How dare you deny the existence of their identity, even if they look ridiculous.
My teachers equated conservative values with violence against a wide variety of marginalized people. In their chronology, marginalized people serve the vital role of being the damsel in distress, and progressive intellectuals are the saviors. This story of marginalized people is so popular that even students at Ivy League schools will claim to suffer discrimination. No, they do not. Students at overpriced schools live on top of the pyramid. Their crap falls on other people. Nothing falls on these gremlins with blue hair. They complain about social issues they will never experience.
Some students have read more papers than me, and those papers are written in a pretentious style that does not convey information without deciphering. The authors comment on works by other writers who use a similar cryptic style to make conjectures on alleged cultural influences. Instead of breaking their assertions into testable hypotheses, they purposely make their language too difficult for most people to dispute. As far as I can tell, most people who use words such as systemic and colonialism have no original ideas yet give themselves awards and academic titles. The great Marxist conversation continues when these papers are cited by anyone who has the same vendetta against normal people. Zorg’s articles appear in various journals that do not require papers to pass peer review. One Bolshevik doofus chooses favorites. Academic standards have become that bad, even at famous schools.
I tried to tell Professor Zorg about a different way of thinking, where people do not have to be the subjects of a narrative. Long ago, a few rich white men decided they had a right to own property. Their belief implies that people are objects that can receive rights. Recognizing that people exist allowed these greedy men to see that individuals have needs. They added more rights, which created a culture where the potential inside people could grow. This made America the land of opportunity, and that is why I decided to live in the United States. We should thank our founding patriarchy. By freeing themselves, they created a nation where every proud boy or girl could write their own story and make America great again. The highly educated scholar did not like my story about individuality and called me racist.
Let us consider if what the doctor says is true. White privilege does exist in some situations; however, winning does not always cause losers. Sometimes, productive people benefit society while they benefit themselves. My teachers detest seeing ordinary people enjoy the success of capitalism, and they hate the working people who enjoy the comforts created by capitalism. They enjoy seeing rioters burn down businesses built by working people. Yet these academic parasites enjoy products made by the people they despise.
So which side is right, capitalism or socialism? Neither side is completely wrong. We need both points of view because society needs different solutions for different problems. Long ago, colleges did have teachers with different points of view. My school has only leftists. The last conservative teacher was pushed out years ago. Now, students are so programmed to see racism in every situation that they have become an army of screaming change agents who attack anyone not assimilated into the collective. Conservative students are hiding.
My teachers insist the story about Marxists taking over the school is a conspiracy told by the ignorant far right. Well, just go to my school in patriotic clothing and see what happens. A delivery guy was beaten into a bloody mess. The school administration called the students peaceful and then accused the guy of inciting violence because he had the wrong color hat. It wasn’t even a political hat. It was from a hardware store.
Let us take a walk down the street to get away from the school of lies. This was a nice neighborhood. Now all anyone can see are junkies, their tents, their trash, and their crime. Don’t blame conservatives for this mess. The people who run this city are mistakenly called liberals. They do not promote the liberal teachings of Jefferson or Mills. Instead, they took millions to pay debts their affiliates acquired while marketing the virtue of helping people. Meanwhile, the streets get worse as they give more money to activist organizations, social causes get more publicity, and brothers and sisters of famous activists live in mansions. Would the tents and the mansions disappear if we stopped feeding money to the spenders? Till then, productive people can no longer safely walk the streets.
Then I saw it. The ceramic idol lay in a trash bin. Nobody came to claim the great professor’s property. No one liked the bastard. I hope someone took the professor’s cats. We should be respectful of the dead and bury the statue someplace nice. Is that what the great professor would have wanted? Maybe not. I am not smart enough to know what a brilliant mind would want. I barely passed the basic philosophy classes. Yet, I question an expert who was certified by a top institution. As I walked along, my simple mind couldn’t stop asking simple questions. What if an American could ask a newcomer a question that was not systemic persecution? What if a migrant likes it when someone asks where they are from? The American and the different person could become friends. Zorg would have said that racists are too dumb to know that such a friendship is unauthentic.
Most humanities teachers say that I will never understand the immigrant experience. I am from another country, but I don’t fit their idea of an ethnically diverse immigrant. Clever people think they can make the rules and define words. They might say that every voice matters. When they want to exclude someone, the excluded body is not every voice. The only characters with authentic voices are those whose performance panders to the standards of the humanities department. I act too white.
In my excluded view, people do not need a diversity and equity index telling them what to do. Ordinary social instincts work just fine, and words leftists consider forbidden sometimes build relationships. This makes me think that my humanities professors do not understand humans. A question can be classified as offensive, but do we need to consider it offensive? A friendship can be classified as unauthentic, but do we need to consider it that way? The answer depends on what kind of person you want to be.
Hegel thought the collective mind becomes the truth. No object is real outside of Big Brother. The collective can deny anything and anyone. So, what prevents that mind from becoming wrong? They don’t start with the truth. Wouldn’t you need truth to build truth? Perhaps they change definitions to keep the illusion working because their identity needs the illusion. Maybe you think a group of people use words in a bad way, but what about those times when the other guy is not the bad guy, but you still demand that he use your words? Do you want the other guy to support your delusions? Perhaps you reached a point where you will not think of the other guy as good. At that point, your fantasy cannot be broken.
My stream of thought was broken when the local drug users started making fun of me for walking down the street carrying a dildo that looked like the guy from The Fifth Element. I never thought of Zorg’s toy that way before. Feminists talk about victims of Patriarchy. Why would one of them own such a Freudian symbol? Unless Zorg subconsciously wanted Patriarchy. Then, I noticed the statue had a colorful lapel pin. It looks like the button you push to make it explode. The Sustainable Development Goal pin from the United Nations represents a framework of agendas. They have seventeen goals to solve all world problems by repeating the magic words resilient, inclusive, and sustainable. Unelected influencers use such words when they plan your lives. Leninists snuck in and started calling us stakeholders, though you do not get any choice. You do get a Great Reset you never asked for.
Make seventeen squares by squaring the numbers one to seventeen and stand these squares on the sides of connected right triangles. This will create a spiral staircase pattern. The creepy little statue is covered with this pattern, and the professor named this symbol after the tarot card The Star and used it as a metaphor for the growth of history. The framework is where progressives expect their expectations to be. They think they have a stairway to heaven. But what emerges from The Star? Is it hope or a vine that will spread out of control? Is it the Tower of Babel?
Let’s keep adding colors to the pride flag and letters to the alphabet name. The ancient Greek philosopher Plato did not want people to construct truth forever, so he wrote a solution in Theaetetus: you can make 17 steps, then you stop. Perhaps the ancients stopped at seventeen because they knew that the complete circle was all you needed for a fully developed society. If you try to add more than 17 stairs, you start replacing the original stairs, and that prevents you from ever going back. The globalists at the UN want to replace the old, and they wear a circle with the 17 steps as a trophy of their victory over the world. I held up the ceramic effigy and told the junkies, “This is the phallogocentric icon of global domination. The owner was a postmodernist who needed this supplement because they deconstructed their real one.” The drug addicts were not impressed. No one ever appreciates the things I say.
The unelected influencers with seventeen goals get to play politburo because they are on the receiving side of debt. They take the money that other people worked for and use it to fly on private jets to talk about the climate crisis. They also control which businesses get loaned money. Which means they control which companies get to do business. And one time at Elitest Camp, they decided all businesses must push social justice on everyone. Thou shalt agree with the equity department, and social media teaches your kid to accuse grandparents of using the wrong words. A working man could get fired for not knowing the right words. These shenanigans have turned us into a Maoist culture where people are afraid of their own thoughts.
You might think that Marxism is supposed to be about workers of the world uniting. No, it never supported the workers. Marxism was made for smelly sellouts who think they will be in charge. Marx was an unemployed, unwashed, lazy bum who invented a way of thinking that turned losers into pompous Academics. Such Intellectuals are also the first to get sent to death camps because these jerks are not actually in control. The narrative controls the revolution against humanity.
Instead of a utopia, Marxism creates constant shortages, endless boredom, and lots of dead people. Your mind needs to ignore reality to want something so incompetent. Fake history is loaded with villains. They can be rich and white or whatever is chosen to hate today. Hate keeps the story alive, as the story thinks for us. The windshield wipers in the mind can wipe away any inconvenient truth. And you will become accustomed to lying to yourself. People get entangled in the narrative and live only to entangle others until they smother the world.
So, how do we know we are not deceiving ourselves? We don’t. However, I am pretty sure that ordinary people can build a happy society without the collective Overmind. Since my professors have mistaken arrogance for knowledge, their agenda to redesign culture is not going to improve anything. Those miserable freaks will create a world without humor or joy. Then they will spend trillions using every channel to advertise themselves, and working men south of Richmond will pay the bills until immigrants accumulate enough debt to be truly equal to you.
You might think we could defeat communism if more people found traditional values or God. You might be right. I’ve never been good at either tradition or faith. I do believe that truth does exist. The truth is not activated or changed by politics. Truth is not a social construct or a word game. Truth is simpler and easier to see. The black eyes on Zorg’s idol are full of eternal anger. Normal people’s eyes don’t turn that way. I was told that good people do not force their agendas on other people. Is the evil fantasy destined to win? There must be a stronger way of doing things. Perhaps where people are honest with themselves. We can stop the Marxist spell if enough of us say the right words. “I deny the Hegelian subject. I deny all the ugly identities for which it stands.”
The End
Read Corruption https://holyanarchy.com/